On Mon Jul 04 18:31:20 2016, dcollinsn@gmail.com wrote: > It seems to me that we should at least document this behavior and test > for it. Since changing it now could affect existing code, and > evidently is not easy (since the tokenizer implements them as uc() and > lcfirst(), it would take a significant overhaul to change this > behavior), we should resolve the documentation ambiguity. This patch > does so, and adds a test. Please read the thread beginning at http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2012/01/msg181429.html I'm unsure as to the right course. -- Karl Williamson --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9360