On Mon Apr 04 03:35:12 2016, demerphq wrote: > On Thu Mar 10 10:33:39 2016, khw wrote: > > In http://nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/235003, which got > > attached to the wrong ticket, it was proposed to possibly revert the > > patch. I do not believe that it is acceptable to eat up all the > > machine's available memory. which would be one consequence of that > > reversion. > > > I believe that this ticket can be closed now. Outside of an issue with > Solaris as far as I know I fixed the issues raised in this thread, > including the ones from zefram. > > ce12e2548182b5bf6788188c520311eef0eca0ca > 595de7616f5ea9813e28dc502de1c480ef2a5a97 > d1c49ad5e2e1b02dbc27f05c9ecf435fae326293 > > and especially > > 401a80220e9b38609f41611345e25c9956fd7157 > ba6840fbf2fdde3e7f1bda1a26f46c901f36d5ec > > If the OP concurs then I think this is done. The OP has not responded one way or the other. I am taking this ticket, and if the OP continues to not respond, after at least 7 days, I will close the ticket -- Karl Williamson --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126182