Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2016
Re: Indented here docs?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Aristotle Pagaltzis
Date:
July 18, 2016 17:28
Subject:
Re: Indented here docs?
Message ID:
20160718172757.GA39637@plasmasturm.org
* Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> [2016-07-18 13:00]:
> On 07/18/2016 12:40 PM, Zefram wrote:
> > Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> > > And it would be best to do this in one fell swoop for all of them,
> > Agreed.
>
> I'm not sure how easy this would be in practice...
Well downgrading to “discouraged” entails no further action so it is
trivial.
And since deprecations historically had no teeth I think we should not
just remove things that have been historically/ambiguously deprecated,
but announce a deadline for them first, so it’s clear that their status
is now no longer ambiguous.
Then for all historical deprecations that do not get slated for removal,
downgrading vs leaving ambiguous has identical effect, except one choice
creates clarity and the other doesn’t.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next