Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round

On 07/13/2016 01:13 PM, Sawyer X wrote:
>
> On 07/10/2016 02:39 AM, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
>> [...]
>> What do others think? 
> This will change to support one depth of reference. What about two? What
> about three? I probably misunderstood something but that seems an
> arbitrary depth to support.

D'oh. I was about to send a comment about the patch as well and read the
code in pp.c to get context and then realized the answer to my question:
It's already there. (Zefram made this comment as well.)

Ignore my email. Sorry. :)

• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Zefram
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Sawyer X
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Sawyer X
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Zefram
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Zefram
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Sanko Robinson