Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round

On 07/10/2016 02:39 AM, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
> [...]
> What do others think? 

This will change to support one depth of reference. What about two? What
about three? I probably misunderstood something but that seems an
arbitrary depth to support.

• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Zefram
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Sawyer X
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Sawyer X
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Zefram
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the firsttime 'round by Zefram
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #128588] Tied hash magic ignored in references the first time'round by Sanko Robinson