On 07/02/2016 12:08 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 2 July 2016 at 21:37, Andreas Koenig > <andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR@franz.ak.mind.de> wrote: >> I'd vote for reverting the change and putting it in a branch until >> Variable::Magic has got the right medicine. > > +1: Variable::Magic not being broken very much should be a blocking condition. On one hand we have a CPAN breaking change, but on the other hand, Dave has fixed a bug in the interpreter. In this specific case, I believe the use-case is edge enough to not justify such a CPAN breakage. (I might be wrong, surely.) I am comfortable waiting for a comment from Vincent, or someone more knowledgeable on this, in order to decide whether to revert or not. If Dave feels comfortable to revert now and wait to decide whether to merge it back or revise it later, I am comfortable with that option too.Thread Previous | Thread Next