develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2016

Re: [PATCH] - fix for Coro (was Re: revert MG consting (Corobreakage) for 5.24?)

From:
Sawyer X
Date:
June 22, 2016 13:36
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] - fix for Coro (was Re: revert MG consting (Corobreakage) for 5.24?)
Message ID:
576A944F.9060806@gmail.com
[Top-posted]

Marc, you are hereby warned that you are in clear violation of our
Standards of Conduct, which reflect an agreement and a demand for a
standard of behavior that allows cooperative work and practical discussion.

If you are unable to refrain from personal attacks and abusive and
denigrating behavior, you will be banned from the list immediately for a
period of one month.

You may have disagreements with others, you may express them, and you
may provide an alternative solution so it could be discussed and
possibly embraced, but you will need to abstain from using abusive and
insulting language.

Thank you.

On 06/21/2016 05:40 AM, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:00:01PM +0100, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote:
>> I have Cc'ed Marc - it's in his hands now whether he wants to incorporate
>> them, but p5p's involvement in fixing Coro should be at an end now.
> Thanks for this list and explanations - in the interest of users I will
> likely bulge one last time and apply these, if possible (there seems to
> be at least one genuine bugfix in there!). I have had reports that these
> patches don't actually work completely, however, so I will unfortunately
> have to look into these in more detail.
>
> Your attitude, on the other hand, is still atrocious.
>
> P5p's involvement in "fixing" Coro and other modules is never at an end
> - as long as p5pers have their current "we give a fuck about modules"
> attitude and people (he is just an example) such as zefram who are
> obviously completely incompetent but still allowed to break stuff without
> any valid rationale or reason, just because they want to are in power, p5p
> is the source of the problem, not an independent agent that might involve
> itself in maintaining perl as a whole form time to time, at their leisure.
>
> It also doesn't help when p5pers spread fud and bullshit about how modules
> abuse internals and are broken, when what is broken is, in fact, perl and
> the whole p5pers process, which is incapable of bringing perl forward but
> obviously capable of a lot of broken experimental stuff that only seems to
> break CPAN, and thus Perl (the more important brother of perl). It doesn't
> help when p5pers make up bullshit about how trivial it is for modules to
> work around their breakage, and then need years to come up with something
> that even passes tests, either.
>
> It also doesn't help that p5pers obviously have time to change their
> censorship policy for mailing lists and blogs with the only goal to
> silence people who digress and merely state facts, while not being able to
> change their maintenance policy to reflect the reality, despite patches being
> available.
>
> This makes everything that p5pers as a whole claim highly suspect, and
> seriously questions your honesty as a group.
>
> In short, your continued attitude of silencing dissent, breaking stuff for
> fun and spreading fud means you will be the rightful target of criticism,
> the source of friction in the community and ultimately reason for perls
> further decline into obsolesence.
>
> You can't steal yourself out of responsibility, no matter how often you try.
> If you break things needlessly, it's your responsibility to clean up
> afterwards. Of course, it would be better not to break things on a whim, but
> that seems to require inhuman strength
>
> I, for once, have made it clear that I won't play these games on the back
> of the people who actually try to use perl. I left perl because of this,
> and on the next major "we break CPAN needlessly" event (given your track
> record, probably with 5.26), I will be out again.
>
> P5pers need to change drastically if they want to regain respect for
> what they do. And I am certainly not the only one who thinks so: If you
> continue like this, I will predict a fatal loss of perl intelligentsia
> within the next five years. Already now people leave perl for python
> because of the continued breakage-introducing policy of p5pers (that they
> acknowledge but refuse to document).
>
> (I haven't proofread things, because I just don't want to waste more time
> on a lost cause - the above is raw stream-of-consciousness. Also, if
> anybody feels insulted, get a grip or seek help, I am not responsible for
> your mental issues).
>




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About