develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2016

Re: Inconsistencies in memory size types

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Father Chrysostomos
June 21, 2016 22:17
Re: Inconsistencies in memory size types
Message ID:
Sawyer X wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 05:28 PM, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
> > Dave Mitchell:
> >> My current preference is that core standardises on Size_t and SSize_t,
> >> and eliminates usage of size_t, ssize_t, STRLEN and MEM_SIZE.
> > I have always liked STRLEN and MEM_SIZE, because the make the code more
> > self-documenting.
> >
> > There!  You never have consensus on anything.
> I think the question is: Would you object to standardizing on Size_t and
> SSize_t, despite preferring to use STRLEN and MEM_SIZE?

I suppose not.  I am just used to seeing the code written a cer-
tain way. :-)

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About