Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2016
Pushed as 7eec73eb790f7c4982edfc28c17c011e8a072490 Cheers, Yves On 9 June 2016 at 10:21, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 Jun 2016 00:06, "Karl Williamson" <public@khwilliamson.com> wrote: >> >> On 06/08/2016 02:38 PM, Dan Collins via RT wrote: >>> >>> Indeed. This test will work with any proposed fix for this patch, and is >>> confirmed failing on blead before Yves' commit, confirmed passing on blead >>> after Yves' commit, and confirmed passing with my patch 0002. >>> >>> So I believe that the best course of action, unless khw believes that >>> this is still likely to increase memory usage significantly in some cases, >>> is to revert ee072c898947f5fee316f1381b29ad692addcf05 and apply 0002 and >>> 0003 - unless there's an argument that ee072c898 is better than 0002.patch. >> >> >> Notice that my email just said 'concerned'. I'm not sure the memory issue >> is a real problem. But, since the patch is already written, and solves the >> problem once and for all, I think your action proposal is correct, but lets >> wait to hear from Yves. > > I think a better solution is to put warn_text in RExC struct and reuse the > same av over and over. I will put togethdr a patch for review. > > Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next