Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2016
On 26 May 2016 at 04:47, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote: > . People who want to use indirect > object syntax certainly won't start their programs with 'no indirect'. Hence, why the suggestion travels in the direction of "this will happen on its own maybe in some future perl under maybe some `use v5.42`" Its just getting the implementation details right enough to be useful first, and then progressing in that direction carefully before it gets exported natively via perl with Perl's own syntax. Because there are very likely to be many people out there using indirect code in production, we don't want to globally break this behaviour on a whim. So you start with a small known safe test target ( the current userbase who are already using `no indirect` ), and then work your way outwards from that. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNLThread Previous | Thread Next