develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2016

Re: [perl #123630] [EXPERIMENT] :const

Thread Previous | Thread Next
David Nicol
May 20, 2016 21:43
Re: [perl #123630] [EXPERIMENT] :const
Message ID:
heavens, it's Warnock's dilemma, extended

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-
> This ticket has had no attention whatsoever.  This means that either (a)
> the feature is bug-free and perfect, or that (b) nobody is using it, or
> that (c) those who are using it are very silent.
> If a is the case, then this feature no longer needs to be experimental.
> If b is the case, it should definitely remain experimental.
> If c is the case, would somebody please speak up and give opinions on the
> feature (whether it works and is designed well, whether it is designed
> poorly, whether it seems like a good design but has bugs, etc.).

"Why would you want to be the last man alive on a sinking ship?" -- Elon

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About