Re: Indirect object syntax - clarification

Sorry, no, I think I have been misunderstood.

I am not suggesting to remove indirect object syntax from documentation.
Nor am I suggesting it shouldn't be removed.  What I wanted to flag was
Kent Fredric's proposal from a couple of years back:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters/128189

Given that there seems to be a consensus in favour of discouraging the
indirect object syntax, isn't it time to look at the perl core enhancements
that Kent F. proposed?  This is not about documentation but the language.

-- 
Ed Avis <eda@waniasset.com>

• Indirect object syntax by Ed Avis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Abigail
• Question on open2() example in perlipc.pod by Glenn Golden
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Glenn Golden
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Lukas Mai
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Chase Whitener
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Abigail
• Re: Indirect object syntax - clarification by Ed Avis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by wolfsage
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Karl Williamson
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Sawyer X
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Kent Fredric
• Re: Indirect object syntax by perl
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Abigail
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Lukas Mai
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Kent Fredric
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Ricardo Signes
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Eric Brine
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Kent Fredric
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Ed Avis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Zefram
• Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Ed Avis
• Re: Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Tim Bunce
• Re: Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Zefram
• Re: Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Ed Avis