Sorry, no, I think I have been misunderstood. I am not suggesting to remove indirect object syntax from documentation. Nor am I suggesting it shouldn't be removed. What I wanted to flag was Kent Fredric's proposal from a couple of years back: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters/128189 Given that there seems to be a consensus in favour of discouraging the indirect object syntax, isn't it time to look at the perl core enhancements that Kent F. proposed? This is not about documentation but the language. -- Ed Avis <eda@waniasset.com>Thread Previous | Thread Next