develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2016

Re: Indirect object syntax

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
May 20, 2016 17:29
Subject:
Re: Indirect object syntax
Message ID:
573F4952.5060901@khwilliamson.com
On 05/20/2016 11:21 AM, Matthew Horsfall (alh) wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote:
>> In private conversation, Ed clearified he wants to remove indirect
>> object notation from examples dealing with constructs other than
>> indirect object notation.
>>
>> I do not object to that.
>>
>
> +1
>
> -- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
>

Not only do I not object to that, I think it is a good idea
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About