develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2016

Re: Indirect object syntax

Thread Previous | Thread Next
May 20, 2016 16:48
Re: Indirect object syntax
Message ID:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 03:27:37PM +0200, Lukas Mai wrote:
> Am 20.05.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Abigail:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:32:37AM +0000, Ed Avis wrote:
>>> I see that there is a general consensus that indirect object syntax is
>>> discouraged and should be removed from documentation examples.  It is time
>>> to revisit Kent Fredric's proposal at
>>> <>?
>> While I don't favour indirect objection notation (other than print),
>> I'm weary of eliminating documentation about it.
> The proposal was to remove indirect object notation from examples, not  
> to remove the documentation for indirect object notation.

In private conversation, Ed clearified he wants to remove indirect
object notation from examples dealing with constructs other than
indirect object notation. 

I do not object to that.


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About