Re: Indirect object syntax

Am 20.05.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Abigail:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:32:37AM +0000, Ed Avis wrote:
>> I see that there is a general consensus that indirect object syntax is
>> discouraged and should be removed from documentation examples.  It is time
>> to revisit Kent Fredric's proposal at
>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters/128189>?
>>
>
>
> While I don't favour indirect objection notation (other than print),
> I'm weary of eliminating documentation about it.

The proposal was to remove indirect object notation from examples, not 
to remove the documentation for indirect object notation.

-- 
Lukas Mai <plokinom@gmail.com>

• Indirect object syntax by Ed Avis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Abigail
• Question on open2() example in perlipc.pod by Glenn Golden
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Glenn Golden
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Lukas Mai
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Chase Whitener
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Abigail
• Re: Indirect object syntax - clarification by Ed Avis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by wolfsage
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Karl Williamson
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Sawyer X
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Kent Fredric
• Re: Indirect object syntax by perl
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Abigail
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Lukas Mai
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Kent Fredric
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Ricardo Signes
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Eric Brine
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Kent Fredric
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Ed Avis
• Re: Indirect object syntax by Zefram
• Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Ed Avis
• Re: Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Tim Bunce
• Re: Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Zefram
• Re: Sub::StrictDecl (was: Indirect object syntax) by Ed Avis