Am 20.05.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Abigail: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:32:37AM +0000, Ed Avis wrote: >> I see that there is a general consensus that indirect object syntax is >> discouraged and should be removed from documentation examples. It is time >> to revisit Kent Fredric's proposal at >> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters/128189>? >> > > > While I don't favour indirect objection notation (other than print), > I'm weary of eliminating documentation about it. The proposal was to remove indirect object notation from examples, not to remove the documentation for indirect object notation. -- Lukas Mai <plokinom@gmail.com>Thread Previous | Thread Next