develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2016

Re: Indirect object syntax

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Lukas Mai
Date:
May 20, 2016 13:27
Subject:
Re: Indirect object syntax
Message ID:
60a9ce75-1ad6-8949-fe3b-835515a013da@gmail.com
Am 20.05.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Abigail:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:32:37AM +0000, Ed Avis wrote:
>> I see that there is a general consensus that indirect object syntax is
>> discouraged and should be removed from documentation examples.  It is time
>> to revisit Kent Fredric's proposal at
>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters/128189>?
>>
>
>
> While I don't favour indirect objection notation (other than print),
> I'm weary of eliminating documentation about it.

The proposal was to remove indirect object notation from examples, not 
to remove the documentation for indirect object notation.

-- 
Lukas Mai <plokinom@gmail.com>

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About