Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2016
On Tue Mar 15 12:31:27 2016, zefram@fysh.org wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > are we seriously saying that we > >cannot fix this now because, we assume, too much code would change > >behaviour? > > > >If that is the case, then the documentation should be updated to reflect > >this policy. > > Yes, we should document that the (default) autovivification behaviour > won't change. > > -zefram > Paul, zefram, et. al.: Could someone propose some wording for this documentation clarification? That would help move this ticket toward closing. Thank you very much. -- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org) --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127712Thread Next