Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper

* "Vincent Pit (VPIT)" <perl@profvince.com> [2016-04-18T08:44:35]
> The dependants seem to use all the features provided by Scope::Upper, so I
> don't really understand what subset would be "easier to keep working".
> Unless all dependents are not treated equal, of course.

The quote I'm going from, from IRC, is:

  Following Pareto's principle, both Return::MultiLevel and TryCatch only
  seem to use the unwind functionality of Scope::Upper.

I read this as, "the great majority of things that end up relying on
Scope::Upper do so for this particular feature."  (I also assume, but did not
confirm, that this considered n-th order dependents, rather than only 1st
order.)

-- 
rjbs

• [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Tony Cook via RT
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Leon Timmermans
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by perl
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by perl
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Leon Timmermans
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Sawyer X
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Kent Fredric
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Ricardo Signes
• [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Sawyer X via RT
• [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Ricardo SIGNES via RT
• [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Kent Fredric
• Re: [perl #127875] Blead breaks Scope::Upper by Karl Williamson