Le 18/04/2016 09:29, Ricardo Signes a écrit : > * Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> [2016-04-18T06:10:56] >> I've spent the last week doing more work on Scope::Upper. > > Thanks for looking into this, Dave. I agree with your remarks on the question > of requiredness of this sort of work, but I'm also glad that it may continue to > work. Although I don't plan to block on Scope::Upper, it is a useful tool. > > (Leon T. was also talking about writing a subset of its functionality that was > easier to keep working, which is what more of Scope::Upper's downstream > dependents use.) > The dependants seem to use all the features provided by Scope::Upper, so I don't really understand what subset would be "easier to keep working". Unless all dependents are not treated equal, of course. VincentThread Previous | Thread Next