Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2016
On Fri Apr 01 14:24:46 2016, sprout wrote: > On Fri Apr 01 07:29:03 2016, davem wrote: > > I'm not familiar enough with the config system to know whether the > > fortify_inc probe should be called d_fortify_inc or something > > instead, I inquired about that a couple of weeks ago. I was informed there was no rhyme / reason / consistency to the use of d_ in Configure script variables. fortify_inc seems to be more intuitive so I went with that. > > I also wonder whether the define in config.h should be prefixed with > > PERL. 'FORTIFY_INC' is pretty generic and could conceivably clash > > with > > something else. > > PERL_FORTIFY_INC is definitely better. Agreed. I'll update the patch on the github remote. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127810Thread Previous | Thread Next