Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2016
On Fri Apr 01 07:29:03 2016, davem wrote: > I'm not familiar enough with the config system to know whether the > fortify_inc probe should be called d_fortify_inc or something instead, Optionally, one can side-step the whole issue by using -Accflags=-DFORTIFY_INC, but that depends on how much you want this to be perceived as an option for ‘geeks’. > I also wonder whether the define in config.h should be prefixed with > PERL. 'FORTIFY_INC' is pretty generic and could conceivably clash with > something else. PERL_FORTIFY_INC is definitely better. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127810Thread Previous