Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2016
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 07:00:53PM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> [2016-03-05T16:59:38]
> > > On Sat Mar 05 10:14:48 2016, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
> > > > $x = "good job";
> > > > @y = qqw( $x hunter );
> > > >
> > > > Is @y now ('good', 'job', 'hunter') or ('good job', 'hunter')?
> > > > I would think the latter.
> > >
> > I prefer the [latter].
>
> Me, too.
>
Do we have to make a choice? If someone is going through the
trouble of implementing qqw() (or something similar named),
why not introduce two constructs, one for each option?
Then the user can use whatever he/she needs.
Abigail
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next