On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:10:02 -0800 "Ulrich Windl" (via RT) <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > then '&&&' would be just the natural thing for the AND-variant. > Did I overlook something that would have prevented use of those > operators? There's no need for a "defined-and" operator in Perl, because there is no undefined value that is true. The regular "and" operators are fine in this circumstance. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANSThread Previous | Thread Next