* Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> [2016-03-05 23:00]: > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2016-03-05 20:10]: > > On Sat Mar 05 10:14:48 2016, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > > > $x = "good job"; > > > @y = qqw( $x hunter ); > > > > > > Is @y now ('good', 'job', 'hunter') or ('good job', 'hunter')? > > > I would think the latter. > > > > I would have assumed the former. So I suppose it’s not obvious. BTW, > > this does the former: > > > > $x = "good job"; > > @y = < $x hunter >; > > I prefer the former. So much so, in fact, that I don’t see any point in > the feature if it does the latter. (I meant that I prefer the *latter* – as the rest of the message should make clear – and that I see the *former* as pointless.)Thread Previous | Thread Next