Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2015
was error on my part, tripped spam filters, now there is a ticket: RT#126953 On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Chad Granum <exodist7@gmail.com> wrote: > Patch sent to perlbug, though I have not gotten a response yet, I am used > to it happening pretty fast.. I wonder if I missed something required... > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Chad Granum <exodist7@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is a proper patch against blead, I will also go ahead and send it in >> to perlbug. >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:12 PM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 in support. For sure. >>> >>> On 18 December 2015 at 03:41, Chad Granum <exodist7@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > So, far the discussion has only been about a single line of code under >>> the >>> > hood. Nobody has raised either concern or support for the feature... >>> > >>> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:34 PM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On 18 December 2015 at 01:58, Chad Granum <exodist7@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > I have no objections to using reftype, except that it returns undef >>> on >>> >> > non-refs which makes the conditional more complicated. >>> >> >>> >> ref($foo) and reftype($foo) eq "HASH" >>> >> >>> >> > Also I would be >>> >> > pretty surprised if someone passed in a blessed ref to change the >>> name >>> >> > of a >>> >> > sub.. >>> >> >>> >> On second thought, you are probably right. Might as well wait to see >>> >> if someone files a bug report. >>> >> >>> >> Yves >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/" >>> >> >> >Thread Previous | Thread Next