On Thu Nov 19 01:42:24 2015, davem wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:08:15PM -0800, Tony Cook via RT wrote: > > I was thinking about it afterwards, and wondered if the attached was > > closer to the spirit of the original change. > > Yes, that looks better. Applied as 2efdfb1e6cf6ff62b97356abd74ba479aee48bc1. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126635