Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2015
On 19 October 2015 at 05:11, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: > Ricardo Signes wrote: >>On the other hand, a future &num could provide a faster magic value that ~~'s >>implementation can know to directly resolve to a numeric comparison. I'd doubt >>it would ever match custom when:num syntax in speed, > > It totally could, without any real difficulty. No offence intended Zefram, but what *you* consider "easy" or "obvious" most people don't. Even on this list. :-) Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next