* Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> [2015-10-14T07:43:05] > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:42:29PM -0700, Karl Williamson via RT wrote: > > > > My only stance on this is that I think (but am convince-able the other > > way) that under /x, anywhere there is a # comment, should also allow a > > (?#...) comment > > I agree. And I'd throw whitespace in it as well: anywhere where we > ignore whitespace under /x, we should allow a # comment, and hence, > should allow a (?#...) comment. I wish I'd read your testing out of this before going through and doing it myself. :-) Anyway, I agree. While I'd rather nobody actually write this, I think that's a matter of style. Anyway: making it a matter of grammar would require either weird inconsistency or breakage. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next