Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2015
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: > unless we want to do a thorough audit to get the OpenBSD > stamp of approval, these warnings are pretty irrelevant to us. I think that audit has already been done for the top-level C files. Undoubtedly there are some hold-outs in extensions and platform-speciific files, but the reason we have my_strlcpy and my_strlcat is so we can use those consistently even on platforms that don't provide them. I'd prefer to see the home-grown versions implemented without the use of strlen, which defeats at least some of the purpose of using them, but so far no one has wanted to tackle that.Thread Previous | Thread Next