Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2015
On Wed Oct 14 15:38:59 2015, jhi wrote: > On Wed Oct 14 15:24:24 2015, jhi wrote: > > > Jarkko: > > > > > > How would this patch: > > > > > > https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Attachment/1332434/711615/0002-very- > > > first- > > > step-to-tidy-up-mess-around-sdk-to-use.patch > > > > > > ... which is from https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=123831 > > > > Missed that one... > > > > > and which Tony Cook and I were discussing last night in #p5p affect > > > this issue? > > > > The above-suggested patch is implicit, I suggested explicit (the > > configurer deciding). But I don't mind either way. Binding together > > the installed SDK and the deployment target is definitely a > > possibility. At least it would be better than the current "link like > > it's 2003" state of things. > > > > With that patch one could also build a backward compatible version, > > by > > hinting -Dld="env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=whatever $cc'", though > > that's quite ugly... > > > > > Thank you very much. > > I think as reasonable first step we could just apply Jens' patch. > Which I tested successfully last night on Darwin/PPC Mac OS X version 10.4.11. > Second minor tweak would be to have the minimum to be 10.4, instead of > 10.3 (as suggested by the macports guys). > > Then we can look into additional cc/ld options like what Craig > described. > > And maybe also add the env $MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET trick to make it > easier to hint the minimum, if one wants. Though as Craig noted, > compiling for ancient releases might not actually even work that well. > > The thing is, we need older OS X boxes to be able to test this. > Anyone still run PPC? Yo! -- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org) --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126360Thread Previous | Thread Next