> Jarkko: > > How would this patch: > > https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Attachment/1332434/711615/0002-very-first- > step-to-tidy-up-mess-around-sdk-to-use.patch > > ... which is from https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=123831 Missed that one... > and which Tony Cook and I were discussing last night in #p5p affect > this issue? The above-suggested patch is implicit, I suggested explicit (the configurer deciding). But I don't mind either way. Binding together the installed SDK and the deployment target is definitely a possibility. At least it would be better than the current "link like it's 2003" state of things. With that patch one could also build a backward compatible version, by hinting -Dld="env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=whatever $cc'", though that's quite ugly... > Thank you very much. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126360Thread Previous | Thread Next