Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error

> What's the gain if /(?-p)/ started dying?

The gain would be consistency. However, your reasoning in [1]
convinced me: the pragmatic thing to do is to leave the code as is.
This can be closed.

• [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Karl Williamson via RT
• [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Victor ADAM
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by demerphq
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Karl Williamson
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Victor ADAM
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Abigail
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Karl Williamson
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by demerphq
• Re: [perl #126185] /(?-p)/ should be an error by Victor ADAM