On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:57:26 -0400 Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote: > Why not let the programmer write what he means explicitly, rather > than implicitly on compile-time "type"? I'm sure the maintainer > would prefer (modulo obvious bikeshedding): I like this idea - we have eq vs ==, so why not have different 'case' style markers. Maybe when(undef) when(Regexp) wheneq(STRING) when==(NUM) ? -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANSThread Previous | Thread Next