Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2015
> I think that the consequences are mild, so it was the right design decision to be a warning. In that case we should fix all the equivalent but inconsistent errors: /(?-a)/ dies with “Regexp modifier "a" may not appear after the "-" in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?-a <-- HERE )/ at -e line 1.” Unless I’m missing something, the two are essentially the same, and should thus have the same behavior. Having /(?-a)/ die but /(?-p)/ warn doesn’t sound like a “right design decision” to me.Thread Previous | Thread Next