Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2015
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:20:58AM -0400, Eric Brine wrote: > For warnings, that's a backwards compatible change I oppose. I was promised > that `use warnings;` would enable all warnings, and I've been recommending > its usage on that basis for a decade. I still don't understand this argument. What is the practical difference to you between "use warnings" not enabling a new warning by default and the new warning never having been added? I don't think anyone is suggesting that any current warnings should not be in the default category, right? -- Paul Johnson - paul@pjcj.net http://www.pjcj.netThread Previous | Thread Next