"Matthew Horsfall (alh)" <wolfsage@gmail.com> wrote: :On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Hugo van der Sanden via RT :<perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: :> :> As far as I can see, the only reference is the captured embed.fnc entry, it's on the unsupported list; I assume after this lands, the next update to PPPort will magically remove grok_atou and add grok_atoUV - Matthew, is that correct? : :If it's been removed from embed.fnc and replaced, the next time we :regen the todo files, etc, then yeah, that should go away and :grok_atoUV should show up. : :Is this something we should do before 5.22 release so it can be included? I'm not sure if by "this" you mean the API change or regen of PPPort. The code changes have already been pushed; net change over a couple of commits (22ff313068, 73e4395489) is: -Apdn |UV |grok_atou |NN const char* pv|NULLOK const char** endptr +EXpn |bool |grok_atoUV |NN const char* pv|NN UV* valptr|NULLOK const char** endptr .. since we also decided we didn't want to commit immediately to freezing the new interface for the public API. I certainly think we'd want to regen PPPort before 5.22 release. HugoThread Previous | Thread Next