Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2015
From: James E Keenan
March 5, 2015 02:35
Message ID: email@example.com
On 03/04/2015 03:12 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Dave Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Since this is an internal implementation detail change to an experimental
>> feature, I'm hoping that it will be non-controversial to merge it into
>> bleed once it passes smoking.
> I'm hoping too that this will be considered non-controversial.
Simply observing the volume of discussion in this thread suggests that
it cannot be considered non-controversial and is therefore ineligible
for Perl 5.22.
I don't claim to have an understanding of opcodes sufficient to take a
stand one way or the other on the issue.
Thank you very much.