> > My inclination is to go with Hugo's option. I dont think reverting I agree. The main point of my patch was to clearly show where and how grok_atou changed things, since I saw to my horror that instead of being one or few clean commits, it was quite a few more, not cleanly separable. > this stuff is ideal. But i think at this point it is up to Hugo. -- There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'. -- Jack CohenThread Previous | Thread Next