On 19 February 2015 at 22:33, Jarkko Hietaniemi via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > To the tune of "everybody should take out their own garbage", attached is a patch that would remove grok_atou(), and leave the atoi() (and strtol, etc.) in their naked glory. But this state of things does not pass e.g. the tests added in > > [perl #123782] regcomp: check for overflow on /(?123)/ > > aka http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commit/b3725d49f914ef2bed63d7eb92a72ef6e886b489 > > But one can take a look at the patch to see where the atoi() spots are. My inclination is to go with Hugo's option. I dont think reverting this stuff is ideal. But i think at this point it is up to Hugo. cheers, YvesThread Previous | Thread Next