On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote: >> >> I suspect that evaluating in the parent is The Right Thing to Do, but >> worry about backwards compatibility. > > > The issue didn't exist until 5.16 > (0e21945565eb4664d843bb819fb032cedee4d5a6), and frankly I see no reason to > do this deliberately. I don't think we have a serious backwards > compatibility issue here. That commit was followed-up by my 985213f, which in theory has the same issue, but with the arbitrary magic GET of this patch any issues in that wolud be fixed. In any case I can't see a way to make a plain system() call change the user running the process WRT the argument list.Thread Previous | Thread Next