Re: RFC: "use re 'strict'"

* Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> [2015-02-05T15:37:20]
> There's no backwards compatibility issues with adding subcategories later
> anyway.
> 
> There's only a backwards compatibility issue if you define that "use
> re::strict" enables *all* strictures, which you wouldn't claim until you
> add categories.

Right, the backcompat I'm talking about is that right now the invocation is:

  use re 'strict';

...which I propose to break by replacement by:

  use re::strict;

Once that is done, what you said is more relevant.

-- 
rjbs

• RFC: "use re 'strict'" by Karl Williamson
• Re: RFC: "use re 'strict'" by Ricardo Signes
• Re: RFC: "use re 'strict'" by Eric Brine
• Re: RFC: "use re 'strict'" by Ricardo Signes
• Re: RFC: "use re 'strict'" by Karl Williamson