develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2014

Re: Is the warning fatalization mechanism in fact safe (specificalyFATAL => 'ununitialized')

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Peter Rabbitson
Date:
December 27, 2014 19:27
Subject:
Re: Is the warning fatalization mechanism in fact safe (specificalyFATAL => 'ununitialized')
Message ID:
549F0828.8050307@rabbit.us
On 12/27/2014 03:44 PM, demerphq wrote:

> IMO these examples are *too* stupid. The second does not enabled
> warnings at all, so no, it is not the same as the first.

Yes, I wrote them in a haste, all criticism stands ;)

>
> You speak of issues related to warning fatal, It would be nice to see
> a reproduction script before we give this rumour credence, otherwise
> it is just FUD.

I speak of *others* having said deeply concerning things. As I do not 
know anything about this part of P5 I started this thread *in order* to 
determine whether this is *just* FUD, or there are in fact unfixed 
structural issues that are somehow lost in the noise.


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About