develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2014

Re: [perl #123069] signature/attribute syntax is awful

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
=?UTF-8?B?0J7Qu9C10LMg0J/RgNC+0L3QuNC9?=
Date:
December 9, 2014 01:41
Subject:
Re: [perl #123069] signature/attribute syntax is awful
Message ID:
CABFBc44WRuiHM19TO2kDBGYLJGk9rKx36Gywuy5SRt2Jz=T7hQ@mail.gmail.com
среда, 29 октября 2014 г. пользователь Tim Bunce написал:

> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:41:34AM +0100, Leon Timmermans wrote:
> >
> >    I agree that feels more natural (), but this also feels like a
> >    highly subjective thing. IMO, ideally we'd allow both variations
> >    (because why wouldn't we?).
>
> Because of the extra cost for people to implement support for variations
> now.
> Because of the extra cost for people trying to maintain perl for years to
> come.
> Because of the extra cost for people trying to teach perl.
> Because of the extra cost for people trying to learn perl.
> Because of the extra cost for people trying to read other people's code.


then we have to remove ahalf of perls strange features like magical vars,
etc :-)


>
> (I don't have a strong view on this particular feature, I just wanted to
> point out that there are good reasons for now allowing multiple
> variations of some proposed feature.)
>
> Tim.
>


-- 
Oleg Pronin,
CTO, Co-Founder,
Crazy Panda LTD
CP Decision LTD

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About