среда, 29 октября 2014 г. пользователь Tim Bunce написал: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:41:34AM +0100, Leon Timmermans wrote: > > > > I agree that feels more natural (), but this also feels like a > > highly subjective thing. IMO, ideally we'd allow both variations > > (because why wouldn't we?). > > Because of the extra cost for people to implement support for variations > now. > Because of the extra cost for people trying to maintain perl for years to > come. > Because of the extra cost for people trying to teach perl. > Because of the extra cost for people trying to learn perl. > Because of the extra cost for people trying to read other people's code. then we have to remove ahalf of perls strange features like magical vars, etc :-) > > (I don't have a strong view on this particular feature, I just wanted to > point out that there are good reasons for now allowing multiple > variations of some proposed feature.) > > Tim. > -- Oleg Pronin, CTO, Co-Founder, Crazy Panda LTD CP Decision LTDThread Previous | Thread Next