develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2014

[perl #123322] Re: [PATCH] perlfunc: document immediate strictureeffect of "our"

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Aristotle Pagaltzis
Date:
December 2, 2014 10:14
Subject:
[perl #123322] Re: [PATCH] perlfunc: document immediate strictureeffect of "our"
Message ID:
20141202101349.GA23005@plasmasturm.org
* Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> [2014-12-02 05:30]:
> While I don't agree with all your arguments against Eric Brine's pro-
> posed wording (in some ways it's just a different way of looking at
> it)

It does not teach incorrect expectations about the behaviour of `our`,
true enough. I do believe that it gives a wrong impression about the
dis-/similarities between `our` OT1H and `my` and `state` OTOH, though.

> I do think your patch makes it abundantly clear, so I recommend
> applying it.

OK, good.

> (You have a commit bit. Are you going to apply it?)

Sure. I posted it to the list first because I wanted to get a second
opinion on it, which you have kindly provided.

Applied as ecafefb82337.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About