Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:25 AM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yet most of us would prefer to see map EXPR, LIST removed in favour of map
> BLOCK list.

Seriously? I bet that would break tons of existing code. E.g. I
frequently use expressions like

    for (map lc, grep defined, @list) { ... }

And I consider this concise syntax very "perlish". :) I also find it
more readable than the block form:

    for (map { lc } grep { defined } @list) {

Anyways, I think removal of "map EXPR, LIST" would have to be enabled
by a pragma and not be the default.

Cheers,
-Jan

• RE: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Herington, Dean
• [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Herington
• [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Eric Brine
• Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by demerphq
• Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Jan Dubois
• Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by demerphq
• Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Salvador Ortiz Garcia
• [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map by Father Chrysostomos via RT