Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2014
Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Salvador Ortiz Garcia
Date:
October 31, 2014 07:45
Subject:
Re: [perl #123090] Not enough arguments for map
Message ID:
54533E2D.3050105@msg.com.mx
On 10/31/2014 01:25 AM, demerphq wrote:
> On 30 October 2014 22:51, Father Chrysostomos via RT
> <perlbug-followup@perl.org <mailto:perlbug-followup@perl.org>> wrote:
>
> On Thu Oct 30 13:55:41 2014, dean.herington@emc.com
> <mailto:dean.herington@emc.com> wrote:
> > This is a bug report for perl from dean.herington@emc.com
> <mailto:dean.herington@emc.com>,
> > generated with the help of perlbug 1.39 running under perl 5.16.3.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > I don't understand the following error. I think the result of the
> > following statement should be the same as the similar one shown
> later.
> >
> > DB<1> p map { a => 1 } 1,2,3
> > Not enough arguments for map at (eval
> 9)[C:/Perl/lib/perl5db.pl:646 <http://perl5db.pl:646>]
> > line 2, near "} 1"
> > syntax error at (eval 9)[C:/Perl/lib/perl5db.pl:646
> <http://perl5db.pl:646>] line 2, near "}
> > 1"
> >
> > DB<2> $a = 'a'
> >
> > DB<3> p map { $a => 1 } 1,2,3
> > a1a1a1
>
> The map entry in perlfunc says:
>
> "{" starts both hash references and blocks, so "map {
> ..." could be
> either the start of map BLOCK LIST or map EXPR, LIST.
> Because Perl
> doesn't look ahead for the closing "}" it has to take a
> guess at
> which it's dealing with based on what it finds just
> after the "{".
> Usually it gets it right, but if it doesn't it won't
> realize
> something is wrong until it gets to the "}" and
> encounters the
> missing (or unexpected) comma. The syntax error will
> be reported
> close to the "}", but you'll need to change something
> near the "{"
> such as using a unary "+" to give Perl some help:
>
> %hash = map { "\L$_" => 1 } @array # perl guesses
> EXPR. wrong
> %hash = map { +"\L$_" => 1 } @array # perl guesses
> BLOCK. right
> %hash = map { ("\L$_" => 1) } @array # this also works
> %hash = map { lc($_) => 1 } @array # as does this.
> %hash = map +( lc($_) => 1 ), @array # this is EXPR
> and works!
>
> %hash = map ( lc($_), 1 ), @array # evaluates to
> (1, @array)
>
> or to force an anon hash constructor use "+{":
>
> @hashes = map +{ lc($_) => 1 }, @array # EXPR, so needs
> # comma at end
>
> to get a list of anonymous hashes each with only one
> entry apiece.
>
> So you could say this is not a bug, or a known limitation.
> However, I would like to try and fix the most obvious cases, like
> your examples, so that it just does the right thing. (That means
> doing look-ahead to see if there is a comma after the closing
> brace, which can only work for the most simple code.)
>
> Personally I usually do ‘map +(...), LIST’, since it always works,
> unless I need multiple statements in the block.
>
>
> Yet most of us would prefer to see map EXPR, LIST removed in favour of
> map BLOCK list.
>
> Yves
>
>
> --
> perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
I think that a note about "{;" should be included in the documentation
to cover both cases.
sortiz.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next