develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2014

Re: Single-item padrange?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Dave Mitchell
October 20, 2014 10:52
Re: Single-item padrange?
Message ID:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:28:24PM -0000, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
> I also wonder why padrange insists that op_next be equal to
> op_sibling.  The B overlay feature seems to complicate things, IMO.

Well, if you want to fix up all the places in that expect a
lexical var and fix them up, and add tests, be my guest!

Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what
they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand. 

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About