On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:25:33PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote: > On 10/14/2014 04:00 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote: > >I want to discuss some modest proposals for better testing of performance > >and optimisations. The first four suggestions are simple, concrete, and (I > >hope) non-controversial. The fifth is more woolly and up for discussion. > > > > Sounds very promising. I look forward to seeing some branches -- perhaps > with one branch for the first 4 features and another for the 5th -- or > perhaps one for each proposal. I plan to do an initial rename of t/benchmark to t/perf (unless anyone has a better suggestion for the new name), then initially add t/perf/opcount.t (which I need right now for my OP_MULTIDEREF branch), then add other files as and when I need them or have time. -- "Do not dabble in paradox, Edward, it puts you in danger of fortuitous wit." -- Lady Croom, "Arcadia"Thread Previous