Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2014
On Tue Oct 14 12:01:32 2014, 2bfjdsla52kztwejndzdstsxl9athp@gmail.com wrote: > Quoth Paul LeoNerd Evans: > > I too am a little put off by the name of what is otherwise a great idea. > > > > I suspect the problem is the subtle distinction between "lvalues that > > are references", and "references that are lvalues". We've always had > > the former; now we have the latter as well. > > Agreed. How about "lreferences" or "lrefs"? I’ve been calling them lvrefs internally, if that matters. (C.f. the new lvref magic type, the lvref op, lvref.t.) -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122947Thread Previous | Thread Next