Quoth Paul LeoNerd Evans: > I too am a little put off by the name of what is otherwise a great idea. > > I suspect the problem is the subtle distinction between "lvalues that > are references", and "references that are lvalues". We've always had > the former; now we have the latter as well. Agreed. How about "lreferences" or "lrefs"? /Bo LindberghThread Previous | Thread Next