On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Paul "LeoNerd" Evans < leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > I too am a little put off by the name of what is otherwise a great idea. > > I suspect the problem is the subtle distinction between "lvalues that > are references", and "references that are lvalues". We've always had > the former; now we have the latter as well. > Good point. It has nothing to do with modifying references as the name claims, and all to do with aliasing.Thread Previous | Thread Next